<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Microsoft Now Very Likely to Launch Surface Pro 4 in July Along with Windows 10, More Information	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://masterherald.com/microsoft-now-very-likely-to-launch-surface-pro-4-in-july-along-with-windows-10/17823/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://masterherald.com/microsoft-now-very-likely-to-launch-surface-pro-4-in-july-along-with-windows-10/17823/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2015 19:11:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Olga		</title>
		<link>https://masterherald.com/microsoft-now-very-likely-to-launch-surface-pro-4-in-july-along-with-windows-10/17823/#comment-55300</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Olga]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2015 19:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterherald.com/?p=17823#comment-55300</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://masterherald.com/microsoft-now-very-likely-to-launch-surface-pro-4-in-july-along-with-windows-10/17823/#comment-48323&quot;&gt;dexman&lt;/a&gt;.

The SP4 is produced, I was ensured on this info by microsoft store several days ago.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://masterherald.com/microsoft-now-very-likely-to-launch-surface-pro-4-in-july-along-with-windows-10/17823/#comment-48323">dexman</a>.</p>
<p>The SP4 is produced, I was ensured on this info by microsoft store several days ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: skylake2		</title>
		<link>https://masterherald.com/microsoft-now-very-likely-to-launch-surface-pro-4-in-july-along-with-windows-10/17823/#comment-49056</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[skylake2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2015 08:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterherald.com/?p=17823#comment-49056</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://masterherald.com/microsoft-now-very-likely-to-launch-surface-pro-4-in-july-along-with-windows-10/17823/#comment-48541&quot;&gt;skylake&lt;/a&gt;.

So glad I&#039;m not the only one who prefers the Oct release date for Skylake over the July one for Broadwell...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://masterherald.com/microsoft-now-very-likely-to-launch-surface-pro-4-in-july-along-with-windows-10/17823/#comment-48541">skylake</a>.</p>
<p>So glad I&#8217;m not the only one who prefers the Oct release date for Skylake over the July one for Broadwell&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: TST		</title>
		<link>https://masterherald.com/microsoft-now-very-likely-to-launch-surface-pro-4-in-july-along-with-windows-10/17823/#comment-48566</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TST]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2015 18:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterherald.com/?p=17823#comment-48566</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Now we have Surface 3 with Atom X7 as Entry level and 
Surface PRO 4 will with Core M? another Entry-Low Mid Level.... Poor choice
Will there be Surface Elite next?

I don&#039;t want fanless crap, I want powerful tablet. If I want fanless I would go with Surface 3.

Intel core M is most crappy Soc for PRO device.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now we have Surface 3 with Atom X7 as Entry level and<br />
Surface PRO 4 will with Core M? another Entry-Low Mid Level&#8230;. Poor choice<br />
Will there be Surface Elite next?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want fanless crap, I want powerful tablet. If I want fanless I would go with Surface 3.</p>
<p>Intel core M is most crappy Soc for PRO device.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: skylake		</title>
		<link>https://masterherald.com/microsoft-now-very-likely-to-launch-surface-pro-4-in-july-along-with-windows-10/17823/#comment-48541</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[skylake]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2015 16:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterherald.com/?p=17823#comment-48541</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Realllly hope that they are holding off so it would have a skylake on it when intel release it.
Having a less powered machine then SP3 with a processor at end of his lifecicle doesnt look like a innovation and/or step forward.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Realllly hope that they are holding off so it would have a skylake on it when intel release it.<br />
Having a less powered machine then SP3 with a processor at end of his lifecicle doesnt look like a innovation and/or step forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dexman		</title>
		<link>https://masterherald.com/microsoft-now-very-likely-to-launch-surface-pro-4-in-july-along-with-windows-10/17823/#comment-48323</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dexman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2015 23:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterherald.com/?p=17823#comment-48323</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[While the wifi only version of the Surface 3 has been released in the US market, the 4G/LTE enabled version is still pending.

If Microsoft is holding back on the Surface Pro 4 to work on getting it as bug free as possible, I...myself...think that is a good thing. But having said that...there really isn&#039;t any reason why Microsoft couldn&#039;t...at least...confirm that the Surface Pro 4 exists. The company doesn&#039;t have to go into detail, just tell us that it is real.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the wifi only version of the Surface 3 has been released in the US market, the 4G/LTE enabled version is still pending.</p>
<p>If Microsoft is holding back on the Surface Pro 4 to work on getting it as bug free as possible, I&#8230;myself&#8230;think that is a good thing. But having said that&#8230;there really isn&#8217;t any reason why Microsoft couldn&#8217;t&#8230;at least&#8230;confirm that the Surface Pro 4 exists. The company doesn&#8217;t have to go into detail, just tell us that it is real.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Minified using Disk

Served from: masterherald.com @ 2026-04-03 03:29:28 by W3 Total Cache
-->