Rats, no edit button so, sorry for typos! :)

It’s all now getting a little far fetched but depends on what History want to do however ” Chinese love interest”….oh dear it sticks out like a sore thumb. So far as I know (i.e. there may be others) Ragnar, if he existed at all, died of cholera or some such after the siege of Paris or in a pit of vipers courtesy of Aella thus we know his end. Rollo’s tomb in in Rouen complete with a little dog in stone at his feet. He died 930 ish as ruler of Normandy; think he outlives most of them :) The Lothbrok sons plus Guthrum and others went on to cause much mayhem for Alfred and the Saxon kingdoms later on. Haraldr Hárfagri did go on to become king of Norway.
The interpretation element is getting looser and looser for me and I’m struggling to maintain an interest thus am hoping that what hitherto has been one of the BEST shows ever in Seasons 1-3, gets it together again as it goes forward.

The thing you don’t understand is that “History” in some way or form is always incorrect when it comes accuracy of past events. This is due to either personal bias and the fact that our memories fade – and thus the historians who captured history always give distort reality, either consciously or subconsciously. Either way, Ragnar’s “historic” story is actually based of series of myths and writings in poetry – he could’ve been a metaphor for “great warrior” for all we know. What the History Channel is doing is that they are giving their own “interpretation” of his death, which in a way is historically correct.

I thought this at least is pretty accurate. Didn’t Ragnar die soon after the siege of Paris?