<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: ‘The Elder Scrolls 6’ Development May Be Pushed Back Further by the Development of ‘Fallout 4 VR’ or ‘Fallout 5’	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://masterherald.com/the-elder-scrolls-6-development-may-be-pushed-back-further-by-the-development-of-fallout-4-vr-or-fallout-5/51047/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://masterherald.com/the-elder-scrolls-6-development-may-be-pushed-back-further-by-the-development-of-fallout-4-vr-or-fallout-5/51047/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2016 11:52:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Zincorium		</title>
		<link>https://masterherald.com/the-elder-scrolls-6-development-may-be-pushed-back-further-by-the-development-of-fallout-4-vr-or-fallout-5/51047/#comment-254663</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zincorium]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2016 02:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterherald.com/?p=51047#comment-254663</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s no reason a VR redo would take anything resembling the resources that would go into a full game- there are already ways to play fallout 4 using current VR headsets, they&#039;re not too bad. While it would be more work than we typically see for patches, I don&#039;t even think the tweaks needed for a good VR experience would represent even as much work as went into the larger pieces of DLC. Which is good, because they wouldn&#039;t be able to sell enough of a VR redo standalone to justify that amount of development, we&#039;re talking a small group who can even play the game on VR, let alone would want to pay $60 or so for it.

I don&#039;t know why 6 is so thoroughly delayed after Skyrim, but I do know that when it does come out it will have a very large customer base with a lot of excitement for it. Bethesda might want to give some other, newer, properties some room to breathe and a chance to become series of their own instead of just relying on their two biggest franchises, and I&#039;m okay with that.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no reason a VR redo would take anything resembling the resources that would go into a full game- there are already ways to play fallout 4 using current VR headsets, they&#8217;re not too bad. While it would be more work than we typically see for patches, I don&#8217;t even think the tweaks needed for a good VR experience would represent even as much work as went into the larger pieces of DLC. Which is good, because they wouldn&#8217;t be able to sell enough of a VR redo standalone to justify that amount of development, we&#8217;re talking a small group who can even play the game on VR, let alone would want to pay $60 or so for it.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know why 6 is so thoroughly delayed after Skyrim, but I do know that when it does come out it will have a very large customer base with a lot of excitement for it. Bethesda might want to give some other, newer, properties some room to breathe and a chance to become series of their own instead of just relying on their two biggest franchises, and I&#8217;m okay with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Minified using Disk

Served from: masterherald.com @ 2026-04-12 15:25:25 by W3 Total Cache
-->