<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Samsung Galaxy S4 Likely to Get the Android 6.0 Marshmallow Update in the Second Quarter of 2016!	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://masterherald.com/samsung-galaxy-s4-likely-to-get-the-android-6-0-marshmallow-update-in-the-second-quarter-of-2016/30456/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://masterherald.com/samsung-galaxy-s4-likely-to-get-the-android-6-0-marshmallow-update-in-the-second-quarter-of-2016/30456/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Feb 2016 12:56:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: mohammad ishtiaq		</title>
		<link>https://masterherald.com/samsung-galaxy-s4-likely-to-get-the-android-6-0-marshmallow-update-in-the-second-quarter-of-2016/30456/#comment-191308</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mohammad ishtiaq]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Feb 2016 12:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterherald.com/?p=30456#comment-191308</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I like that s4 get marshmallows]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like that s4 get marshmallows</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rupjyoti Sharma		</title>
		<link>https://masterherald.com/samsung-galaxy-s4-likely-to-get-the-android-6-0-marshmallow-update-in-the-second-quarter-of-2016/30456/#comment-186779</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rupjyoti Sharma]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2016 19:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterherald.com/?p=30456#comment-186779</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great to know Samsung included Galaxy s4 i9500 to get 6. 0 marshmallow update bcause lollipop 5. 0. 1 has lots og bugs and needs to get a stable 6. 0 update..]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great to know Samsung included Galaxy s4 i9500 to get 6. 0 marshmallow update bcause lollipop 5. 0. 1 has lots og bugs and needs to get a stable 6. 0 update..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jon		</title>
		<link>https://masterherald.com/samsung-galaxy-s4-likely-to-get-the-android-6-0-marshmallow-update-in-the-second-quarter-of-2016/30456/#comment-175555</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2016 17:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterherald.com/?p=30456#comment-175555</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[marshmallow for s4 in late 2016? haha, BS! even if it&#039;s true, who gives a F*, this phone didn&#039;t even get 5.1 despite 5.0 having tons of bugs. s4 was my last samsung device.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>marshmallow for s4 in late 2016? haha, BS! even if it&#8217;s true, who gives a F*, this phone didn&#8217;t even get 5.1 despite 5.0 having tons of bugs. s4 was my last samsung device.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Watcher		</title>
		<link>https://masterherald.com/samsung-galaxy-s4-likely-to-get-the-android-6-0-marshmallow-update-in-the-second-quarter-of-2016/30456/#comment-161871</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Watcher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2015 15:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterherald.com/?p=30456#comment-161871</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Galaxy S4 is an amazing phone, which raised the bar for all smart phones 2 years ago. If companies are ready to abandon support for ($600+) phones after a mere two years, consumers should really slow down on the phone upgrades to send a message to these manufactures and mobile companies. Mobile phones is the only electronic device that people spend so much money on, and are willing to ditch for another 600+ device 2 years later. Most of the time the current phones aren&#039;t even paid off yet and companies want you to jump to the next version.

Consumers need to speak with their money and stop this insanity. Consumers need to ask themselves when they buy any of the following electronics, how long do they expect to use them before upgrading:

1. Smart TV
2. Computer / Laptop
3. MP3 Player

You can a acquire a decent brand of these items for around the same price of a newly released Galaxy or IPhone series smartphone. Yet most purchasers don&#039;t look to upgrade these items in two years.

 One exception with Apple as they still supports my clunky classic 80 gig iPod I bought 8 years ago. Why can&#039;t mobile manufactures do the same?

 I still have my S4 in perfect condition and refused the S6 due to the direction Samsung took with the Galaxy series. I will upgrade when I see a phone raise the bar as high as the S4 did 2 years ago (which may not even be a Samsung brand).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Galaxy S4 is an amazing phone, which raised the bar for all smart phones 2 years ago. If companies are ready to abandon support for ($600+) phones after a mere two years, consumers should really slow down on the phone upgrades to send a message to these manufactures and mobile companies. Mobile phones is the only electronic device that people spend so much money on, and are willing to ditch for another 600+ device 2 years later. Most of the time the current phones aren&#8217;t even paid off yet and companies want you to jump to the next version.</p>
<p>Consumers need to speak with their money and stop this insanity. Consumers need to ask themselves when they buy any of the following electronics, how long do they expect to use them before upgrading:</p>
<p>1. Smart TV<br />
2. Computer / Laptop<br />
3. MP3 Player</p>
<p>You can a acquire a decent brand of these items for around the same price of a newly released Galaxy or IPhone series smartphone. Yet most purchasers don&#8217;t look to upgrade these items in two years.</p>
<p> One exception with Apple as they still supports my clunky classic 80 gig iPod I bought 8 years ago. Why can&#8217;t mobile manufactures do the same?</p>
<p> I still have my S4 in perfect condition and refused the S6 due to the direction Samsung took with the Galaxy series. I will upgrade when I see a phone raise the bar as high as the S4 did 2 years ago (which may not even be a Samsung brand).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: DS		</title>
		<link>https://masterherald.com/samsung-galaxy-s4-likely-to-get-the-android-6-0-marshmallow-update-in-the-second-quarter-of-2016/30456/#comment-159007</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2015 13:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterherald.com/?p=30456#comment-159007</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I am thinking that they will forget Galaxy s4. thanks samsung to remember s4]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am thinking that they will forget Galaxy s4. thanks samsung to remember s4</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rico		</title>
		<link>https://masterherald.com/samsung-galaxy-s4-likely-to-get-the-android-6-0-marshmallow-update-in-the-second-quarter-of-2016/30456/#comment-149778</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rico]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2015 11:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterherald.com/?p=30456#comment-149778</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I Like it S4 GT-i9500 update 6.0 Marshmallow
Google and Samsung Txs Love you]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I Like it S4 GT-i9500 update 6.0 Marshmallow<br />
Google and Samsung Txs Love you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Minified using Disk

Served from: masterherald.com @ 2026-04-11 02:54:07 by W3 Total Cache
-->