<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Rumored to be Weaker than Surface Pro 3	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://masterherald.com/microsoft-surface-pro-4-rumored-to-be-weaker-than-surface-pro-3/12485/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://masterherald.com/microsoft-surface-pro-4-rumored-to-be-weaker-than-surface-pro-3/12485/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 00:11:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jerry Appleseed		</title>
		<link>https://masterherald.com/microsoft-surface-pro-4-rumored-to-be-weaker-than-surface-pro-3/12485/#comment-31139</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jerry Appleseed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 00:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterherald.com/?p=12485#comment-31139</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The only problem with Apple is their inferior OS. 

I will buy Apple products the day they come pre-loaded with the best OS on the planet, that&#039;s none other than Microsoft Windows.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only problem with Apple is their inferior OS. </p>
<p>I will buy Apple products the day they come pre-loaded with the best OS on the planet, that&#8217;s none other than Microsoft Windows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jen		</title>
		<link>https://masterherald.com/microsoft-surface-pro-4-rumored-to-be-weaker-than-surface-pro-3/12485/#comment-28742</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2015 19:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterherald.com/?p=12485#comment-28742</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://masterherald.com/microsoft-surface-pro-4-rumored-to-be-weaker-than-surface-pro-3/12485/#comment-28446&quot;&gt;oliver&lt;/a&gt;.

You can lower the resolution to whatever you like, then save that as a profile.  Then with one click, you can have the lower resolution for work, and then click back to the higher resolution to play.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://masterherald.com/microsoft-surface-pro-4-rumored-to-be-weaker-than-surface-pro-3/12485/#comment-28446">oliver</a>.</p>
<p>You can lower the resolution to whatever you like, then save that as a profile.  Then with one click, you can have the lower resolution for work, and then click back to the higher resolution to play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jen		</title>
		<link>https://masterherald.com/microsoft-surface-pro-4-rumored-to-be-weaker-than-surface-pro-3/12485/#comment-28741</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2015 19:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterherald.com/?p=12485#comment-28741</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I keep seeing comparisons to the screens on the two devices, but they all fail to mention the most important difference in that the Surface Pro screen is a touchscreen, not just a boring static do nothing screen.  Not to mention, the keyboard can be simply removed and it&#039;s now a portable tablet, TV, music player, video chat portal ect.  That shiny macbook cannot do any of that.  It also cannot simply connect to a external monitor because it only has one port.  The new macbook just seems like a far less useful device no matter which way you look at it.  In fact the macbook doesn&#039;t even compare well with the Surface Pro 3]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I keep seeing comparisons to the screens on the two devices, but they all fail to mention the most important difference in that the Surface Pro screen is a touchscreen, not just a boring static do nothing screen.  Not to mention, the keyboard can be simply removed and it&#8217;s now a portable tablet, TV, music player, video chat portal ect.  That shiny macbook cannot do any of that.  It also cannot simply connect to a external monitor because it only has one port.  The new macbook just seems like a far less useful device no matter which way you look at it.  In fact the macbook doesn&#8217;t even compare well with the Surface Pro 3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: kyle		</title>
		<link>https://masterherald.com/microsoft-surface-pro-4-rumored-to-be-weaker-than-surface-pro-3/12485/#comment-28452</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kyle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2015 16:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterherald.com/?p=12485#comment-28452</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This actually doesn&#039;t surprise me at all. The fact that they can say cut of 10% of the performance of the previous generation but run it fan less. This benefits more users more of the time then the power users that are maxing the thing out. If you are maxing a surface out... you should be looking at a Desktop or different laptop.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This actually doesn&#8217;t surprise me at all. The fact that they can say cut of 10% of the performance of the previous generation but run it fan less. This benefits more users more of the time then the power users that are maxing the thing out. If you are maxing a surface out&#8230; you should be looking at a Desktop or different laptop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: oliver		</title>
		<link>https://masterherald.com/microsoft-surface-pro-4-rumored-to-be-weaker-than-surface-pro-3/12485/#comment-28446</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[oliver]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2015 15:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masterherald.com/?p=12485#comment-28446</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[lower the freak&#039;n resolution. 

I&#039;m not wanting to watch HD videos on a SP3 (or 4!) I want to WORK.

Remoting into other machines is nigh impossible when you&#039;re resolution makes icons the size of grains of sand.

HD would be fine if other computers (especially MS terminal services) could account for it - but as of now there are many steps required in getting things functioning in a useful way.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lower the freak&#8217;n resolution. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not wanting to watch HD videos on a SP3 (or 4!) I want to WORK.</p>
<p>Remoting into other machines is nigh impossible when you&#8217;re resolution makes icons the size of grains of sand.</p>
<p>HD would be fine if other computers (especially MS terminal services) could account for it &#8211; but as of now there are many steps required in getting things functioning in a useful way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Minified using Disk

Served from: masterherald.com @ 2026-04-17 03:13:15 by W3 Total Cache
-->